Unlawful Justice Essay Example for Free

Unlawful Justice EssayMany people corroborate disagreements on the shoemakers last penalization. My opinion on this argument is that we should abolish the dying penalty from our criminal punishment system. As someone once said two wrongs do non make a right and I think that he is right. It is not doing justice killing another mortal because that person killed someone. My friend says this If the person didnt besotted to kill them they should fuck but, if they wanted to kill them then they should die(Holeman). More than half of the countries in the world concord abolished capital punishment from law or practice. more or less of these countries that have abolished it, to us are considered third world countries. Are we any better than these third world countries if we still use the hold backping point penalty and they dont? A total of 109 countries have abolished the goal penalty. 749 prisoners have been executed since capital punishment was resumed in 1977.Almost all th e states in the U.S. use the lethal injection if they rase have the demolition penalty. Electrocution that used to be widely used is now the second most used. Very few states use the gas chamber, hanging, and inflammation squad and most of the states have lethal injection as a secondary. Most people influence the lethal injection as the most humanistic but all of them are very terrible goals to die. On January 1st2001 there were around 3,700 inmates on death speech. The average cost to seek the death penalty is $218,112 and that is added to the total cost of the case. U.S. isthe leader in killing kids worldwide. We have sentenced 160 children to death since 1973. There is not really an official age at which you can sentence a child to the death penalty. Mississippi sought the death penalty in 1996 for kids of the age of 13.Most kids sent to death row are colored and stats show that two out of three kids sent to death row are children of color. Also, almost 90% of people putto death for committing a crime were convicted of murdering whites but, about half of all homicide victims in the U.S. are colored. It is so bad in Maryland that if you kill a white person you are seven times more likely to get the death sentence than if you murder a colored person. About 90 % of the people that the U.S. establishment prosecutors tried and execute are Black or Latino. Many people that seek the death penalty only want it for people that are not white.another(prenominal) major problem with the system is that even if you are innocent you have a high chance of being put on death row. Around 23 innocent people have been sentenced to death row and have been executed for crimes they did not commit this century. More than 69 people have been released from death row since 1972 for being wrongly convicted. That is more than one innocent person for every100 convicts on death row. One example of misguided guilt was of Robert Nelson Drew who was executed even after another man c onfessed to the murder.A few countries other than the U.S. show that we dont execute people that bad. Go live in Afghanistan they leave behind stone you to death or maybe go to Sudan whereyou can be stoned or crucified and other countries even behead you. Another bad thing about the death penalty is that in Florida each of the states executions cost $3.2 million and life inprison only cost $600,000. Spending our taxpayers money on the death penalty takes away from more important stuff for example investigating drug crimes, domestic violence, and child abuse. If we did not have the death penalty we could have better education and rehabilitation.Around five years ago many Americans heavily fight downed the death penalty and around 80% of Americans favored executing convicted murders. According to the polls now it is at 66 percent that is a major drop. In ten or twenty years will we even have the death penalty? Now for the first time for a very long time people can debate whether we should have the death penalty or not.Governor George Ryan of Illinois started up the train to debate the death penalty and has it moving. Many states in the U.S. are looking over the death penalty in their state.In the 1990s the death penalty was the main thing to do to get tough on crime movement. In the 90s the death penalty has seen the toughest increase in deathrow inmates. With President Clinton in office he expanded the federal death penalty to additional 60 more crimes.Now I come to my conclusion many people have disagreements on the death penalty but nobody will change over my decision. If you look at the facts the death penalty has some major mess-ups. Nobody is going to be able to correct those fullyand the only way to stop the mess-ups is to abolish the death penalty. Many innocent people are killed and a lot of jurors are racist and judge the crime poorly. Almost half of the countries in the world have abolished it why shouldnt we.What if you were wrongly accused of co mmitting a crime and were put to death would justice have been served I think not. Do you see why it should be abolished? Maybe some day you will march against the death penalty even if you dont just please do not support it. Thank you for your time and I hope you learned a lot about the death penalty.Works Citedwww.web.amnesty.org 2 April 2002www.agitator.com 2 April 2002www.abcnews.go.com 2 April 2002www.derechos.org/dp/ 2 April 2002www.uscourts.gov 2 April 2002www.ncadp.org 2 April 2002www.amnesty-usa.org 2 April 2002www.alternet.org 2 April 2002www.prodeathpenalty.com 8 March 2002Pence, Alex. Death Penalty. Report by Alex Pence. 2001Holeman, Spencer. Interview. 4 April 2002